Did You Know?
I was blown away by this video presentation. It is simply amazing how many things happen that you overlook, and in such a small amount of time, too. My brothers and I have discussions about things like this. In the early 1990's, video games were just beginning to be produced, with unrealistic graphics and extremely picselated visuals. Now, barely 20 years later, graphics in video games have improved exponentially, and in the near future there is no telling what will happen. My guess is that it will be an an entirely virtual experience one day, with players feeling that they are actually in the game.
What both concerns and impresses me by this presentation is how they ended it, with the question "So what does it all mean?" Who is to say? No one can. It is an intimidating, yet exciting, concept.
Mr. Winkle Wakes
This video really made me think. Firstly, I will present my concern, which is a question "why haven't schools intergrated as much technology into their system as other things have?" I cannot give a precise answer, but that concern opened up a sense of relief, oddly enough.
My relief is this realization: a long time ago, schools were run not much differently than they were only a few years ago. It seemed to work back then, so it does not make much sense to change something that is already good. Of course there have been changes here and there with schools, some may say drastic ones, but if the school systems stick with what worked in the past, education may look promising in the future.
Sir Ken Robinson: The Importance of Creativity
I have seen this video before, and I must say that I am glad to be seeing it again.
Firstly, I have to say I agree with Sir Ken Robinson. School does seem to kill creativity. One such is example is what Sir Ken addressed, the issue of funds not being properly organized for extra curricular activities, such as dance, art, music, etc. Who's to say that these things aren't as important as math, science or english? I have a friend who is a graphic design major, and many of his courses are in the art building. He often tells me of how the school does not provide adequate funds for the art building. We see art everywhere. It is important.
Another friend of mine, my girlfriend, is a fantastic dancer, whom I was reminded of when Sir Ken Robinson spoke of the little girl at the end of his presentation. The little girl did not need medication to stifle her creativity; she needed to dance. Likewise, my girlfriend expresses herself through movement (dance) and not with words (like an english class). To her, creativity is everything, and it should be to many.
Cicelia Gault Interviews Sir Ken Robinson
This video is wonderful, and I, like Sir Ken Robinson, would also like to adress the three myths of creativity. The first, 'only certain people are creative' and the third, 'you're either creative or you're not,' can go hand in hand. I think that everyone is creative in their own way, and the only reason why someone wouldn't be is if no one ever encouraged them to take their creativity further. I know that many people lose interest in their creative abilities because no one showed interest in the first place.
The second myth, 'creativity is only about certain things,' is also a rediculous notion, which I think is another factor which stifles creativity at a young age. People say things like 'oh, you will never get anywhere with singing; try dancing' and vice versa. I think any parent, teacher or supervisor, when sensing creativity in a child, should do anything in their power to direct that child into further expanding their natural talent.
Vicki Davis: Harness Your Students' Digital Smarts
Vicki Davis's class reminds me so much of EDM310: an innovative classroom setting which involves not only becoming someone who is technologically literate, but also a self-learner. She mentions how when she says a new word her students are expected to look it up if they do not understand it, which is a great teaching tool in my opinion.
She reminds me tremendously of Dr. Strange, who also believes that the best way to learn is to do rather than simply listen to a lecture and 'burp it back up.' Another similarity between Dr. Strange and Vicki Davis, and also one I admire, is that eventually things like pens and paper become a nuisance; they both promote a 'green' classroom setting.
Hey Matthew! Well it is quite a coincidence that I was assigned to your blog for C4C this week because your in my podcast group. Anyways,I agree with you that in the Did You Know? video that there was a lot of things that we overlook.I also agree that one day video games are going to become so advanced that it will feel like your literally in the game.
ReplyDeleteMatthew,
ReplyDeleteI understand what you say about Mr. Winkle Wakes; that "back in the day" the way schools worked was great and things were good the way they functioned. But today, how can this be a good way with the world we life in now? Most new jobs now include the skill of someone who has experience with computers. If we don't start students early enough, have we prepared them for their future? I really can't find relief in this thought. I am confused about what you are trying to say about that giving you a feeling of relief, and that it looks promising in the future. Please comment back so I can understand further.
I really enjoyed your comments about The Importance of Creativity. I know that I would have loved to have more classes of music that other things that I had to take. Accounting was one of those classes!!! I hated it!
Great post Matthew,
Stephen Akins
I find some of your conclusions interesting. You praise Dr. Strange and Vicki Davis' classrooms for being innovative while you state that schools that were successful in the past can continue to be successful if they don't innovate.
ReplyDeleteSchool as we know it works really, really well for about 25% of the students. It works passably for about another 25%. That leaves the rest that it doesn't work for at all. You already know this, reflect on the students in your classes in elementary school. Reflect on your high school classes. School as we know it at best works only for half the students.
I would love for you to explain your thinking behind your conclusion that if schools stick to what worked in the past will bring a bright future.
To Wm Chamberlain
ReplyDeleteThis also can apply to Stephen
To be quite honest sometimes I'm actually 50/50 with this issue, I think that's why there are some inconsistencies with my responses. At one moment I was saying one thing and the next I'm saying the opposite. I think the reason for this -and your percentages- are because it works for some people and it simply doesn't for others. And, oddly enough, at times I think incorporating technology more into our classrooms is a good thing, while sometimes I don't think it's so good. My opinion fluctuates. I can only conclude that the reason behind this is I am young and only just beginning to touch this delicate subject. It will probably be a while until I establish my final view of the matter.
Thank you for your comment; it really helped me to reflect on this, even more than I already have.
Stephen,
It gives me a sense of relief because I'm old fashioned, not only with the subject at hand but with many things. Your point about most new jobs requiring individuals with computer experience is a good one -with that I cannot argue. I suppose just with my particular experience (I'm an English major) technology, at least not yet, is not absolutely crucial for me to make steps towards my career. It will help, yes, but extensive use of it isn't crucial at this point.
Notwithstanding, my opinion is always subject to change.
I see what you mean. Hopefully we can introduce you to something in this class that will help you decide what will be your final judgement. I think we can convince you that technology is worth your while!
ReplyDeleteMatthew, thanks for following up. I love how ready you are to listen and reflect. You are going to learn a lot this semester.
ReplyDelete